Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Celtics

Fair
Average
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,878,397 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.739. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 31.0 Celtics.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Celtic Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $43,621, a difference of 11.4%), median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $54,242, a difference of 9.0%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $83,193, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $38,283, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $50,447, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $60,608, a difference of 2.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanCeltic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
27.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 31.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.2%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and single female poverty (23.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanCeltic
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
10.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 96.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 91.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 85.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.6%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanCeltic
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
81.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 45.0%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.1%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (61.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanCeltic
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Poor
33.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 93.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 7.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 28.5%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and associate's degree (36.5% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.32%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Good
1.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 43.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 33.4%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.96%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanCeltic
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%