Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,594,921 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to a decrease of 9.1 Immigrants from Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $50,950, a difference of 30.1%), median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $62,057, a difference of 24.7%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $95,032, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $64,828, a difference of 4.0%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $55,022, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 57.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 44.1%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.63%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 88.5%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 88.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 87.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 24.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 67.0%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 32.6%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.1%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 41.1%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 57.7%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 50.6%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.060%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 72.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 53.9%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.0%).