Alaskan Athabascan vs Chinese Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Chinese
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Chinese
37.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chinese Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,775,598 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649 and weighted average of 37.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,513,648 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522 and weighted average of 30.2%, a difference of 24.7%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Chinese |
| Minimum | 12.2% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 87.8% | 94.5% |
| Mean | 64.8% | 41.4% |
| Median | 63.4% | 33.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 36.2% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 48.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 63.8% | 24.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 32.5% | 25.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.1% | 25.4% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Hispanic or Latino (37.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Liberia (37.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Creek (37.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Seminole (37.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and Blackfeet (37.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 37.4% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 37.4% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 37.4% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 37.5% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 37.5% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 37.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 37.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 37.7% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 37.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 37.9% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 37.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 38.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 38.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 38.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 38.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are European (30.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Vietnamese (30.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Croatian (30.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Icelander (30.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Syrian (30.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Ugandans | 89.2 /100 | #120 | Excellent 30.1% |
| Koreans | 88.9 /100 | #121 | Excellent 30.1% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 30.1% |
| Syrians | 88.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Croatians | 88.0 /100 | #124 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Vietnamese | 87.7 /100 | #125 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Europeans | 87.2 /100 | #126 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Chinese | 87.1 /100 | #127 | Excellent 30.2% |
| Icelanders | 86.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 85.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 85.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 30.3% |
| New Zealanders | 85.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 30.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 30.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 30.4% |