Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Malaysians

Fair
Fair
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Malaysian Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,008,773 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.253. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to a decrease of 24.5 Malaysians.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Malaysian Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $58,244, a difference of 7.0%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $81,064, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $94,517, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,163 compared to $39,194, a difference of 0.080%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $88,291, a difference of 0.18%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $51,615, a difference of 0.19%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanMalaysian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Tragic
$39,194
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Tragic
$95,230
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Tragic
$81,064
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Tragic
$43,844
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Tragic
$50,772
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Tragic
$37,298
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Poor
$51,615
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Tragic
$88,291
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Tragic
$94,517
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Tragic
$58,244
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Excellent
25.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.7%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.7%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.11%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and female poverty (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.80%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanMalaysian
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Poor
9.6%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
18.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
12.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 87.0%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 84.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 82.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanMalaysian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanMalaysian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
39.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
82.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.6%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.31, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanMalaysian
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Exceptional
3.31
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Poor
45.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Tragic
33.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 102.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanMalaysian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 88.8%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanMalaysian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
93.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
90.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
89.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Tragic
83.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 67.4%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.37%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Malaysian Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanMalaysian
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.5%