Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,510,760 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.971. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 84.8 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $47,394, a difference of 21.0%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $89,496, a difference of 17.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $104,992, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $51,914, a difference of 0.39%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $63,643, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 51.9%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 47.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.2%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 100.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 100.0%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 98.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 19.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.5%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 24.3%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (61.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 58.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.70%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 50.7%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 47.7%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.19%), 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 80.2%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.36%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 14.3%).