Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Icelander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Icelanders

Fair
Good
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Icelander Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,955,685 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.406. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 15.1 Icelanders.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Icelander Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $44,987, a difference of 14.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $102,261, a difference of 12.4%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $85,797, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $51,247, a difference of 0.91%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $61,270, a difference of 1.7%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $39,109, a difference of 3.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanIcelander
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Excellent
$44,987
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Good
$104,282
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Good
$85,797
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Good
$46,916
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Good
$55,415
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Fair
$39,109
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Tragic
$51,247
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Good
$95,560
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Good
$102,261
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Average
$61,270
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
27.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 43.1%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 40.0%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanIcelander
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Good
11.9%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
21.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Good
13.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Excellent
15.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Fair
29.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 95.9%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 95.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 93.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanIcelander
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Average
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanIcelander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
40.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Average
82.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 45.8%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.22%), family households (61.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanIcelander
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Excellent
30.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 62.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 5.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanIcelander
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
9.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Exceptional
90.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 37.2%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 33.9%), and associate's degree (36.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.060%), 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.38%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanIcelander
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
90.5%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
48.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Excellent
39.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 66.4%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 46.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.060%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Icelander Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanIcelander
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Excellent
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
46.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%