Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,637,832 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.109. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 5.1 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $56,722, a difference of 9.9%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and per capita income ($39,163 compared to $37,857, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $90,909, a difference of 0.050%), median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $49,190, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($43,393 compared to $42,884, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 26.1%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.0%), male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and family poverty (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 85.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 82.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 81.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.0%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.6% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.85%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple households (43.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 90.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 114.8%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.6%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (61.0% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 0.50%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and nursery school (98.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 67.4%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and female disability (13.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 8.6%).