Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,151,650 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.381. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 5.0 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $57,953, a difference of 48.0%), median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $67,634, a difference of 35.9%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $102,562, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 9.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $56,660, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $69,164, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 60.5%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 60.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.94%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 94.4%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 93.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 87.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 28.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 70.8%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 43.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.8% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 0.85%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.5%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 39.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 21.4%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 0.44%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 81.5%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 80.4%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 68.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.11%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 80.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 62.7%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 18.6%).