Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ireland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,422,480 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Immigrants from Ireland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 34.9 Immigrants from Ireland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $56,584, a difference of 44.5%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $104,692, a difference of 37.1%), and median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $67,698, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $68,495, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $57,075, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 71.2%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 60.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.6%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 95.9%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 86.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 79.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 29.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 83.1%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 46.0%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 49.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 26.6%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 0.49%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 76.6%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 65.6%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.19%), 10th grade (95.4% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 75.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 64.8%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.5%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.0%).