Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,836,284 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.932. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 58.3 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 23.0%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $55,394, a difference of 12.5%), and per capita income ($39,163 compared to $41,709, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($94,429 compared to $94,665, a difference of 0.25%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $92,208, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $90,448, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 29.2%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and single female poverty (23.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 62.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 57.6%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 50.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 63.0%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 22.1%), and divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), married-couple households (43.6% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 107.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 75.3%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 42.3%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 65.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 114.6%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 33.7%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (61.0% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 119.6%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 70.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 67.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.5%).