Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Ecuadorians

Fair
Poor
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,964,955 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 22.6 Ecuadorians.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $54,958, a difference of 13.4%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 12.5%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $82,070, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($94,429 compared to $95,114, a difference of 0.73%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $93,739, a difference of 3.1%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $39,117, a difference of 3.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Exceptional
22.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 33.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 32.0%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.84%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanEcuadorian
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 60.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 60.1%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanEcuadorian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 44.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
82.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.5%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.6% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanEcuadorian
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Poor
33.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 80.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 56.2%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 10.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 31.5%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 45.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
4.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 101.6%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 22.8%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.4% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 1.7%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 112.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 62.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanEcuadorian
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%