Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,013,722 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.980. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.653% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 652.8 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $54,264, a difference of 38.6%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $105,335, a difference of 37.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $119,756, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $69,174, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $57,931, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 70.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 60.4%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 95.8%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 87.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 86.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 45.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 82.9%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 52.8%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.40%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (61.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.2%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 83.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 80.0%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 76.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 102.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 80.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 73.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.0%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 16.5%).