Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from England Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,286,949 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.771. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.114% in Immigrants from England. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 114.1 Immigrants from England.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $48,844, a difference of 24.7%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $92,098, a difference of 20.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $109,446, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $51,817, a difference of 0.20%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $65,715, a difference of 5.4%), and wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 47.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 46.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.6%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 92.5%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 91.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 86.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 54.1%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.4%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (61.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 79.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 5.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 47.3%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 43.8%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.080%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.2%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 46.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.1%).