Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,983,225 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.858. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 48.4 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $49,893, a difference of 27.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $112,175, a difference of 23.3%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $94,091, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $52,638, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $66,620, a difference of 6.9%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $41,771, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 63.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 56.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.3%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 101.3%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 98.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 94.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 62.5%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.2%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.8%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.12, a difference of 4.5%), and family households (61.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 87.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 50.2%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 46.7%), and associate's degree (36.5% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.4% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.21%), 9th grade (96.4% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.6%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 5.8%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 8.6%).