Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bangladeshi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Bangladeshis

Fair
Fair
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,611
SOCIAL INDEX
23.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
249th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bangladeshi Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,887,142 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Bangladeshis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to a decrease of 6.8 Bangladeshis.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Bangladeshi Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.3%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $54,719, a difference of 13.9%), and per capita income ($39,163 compared to $35,897, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($76,383 compared to $74,112, a difference of 3.1%), median earnings ($43,393 compared to $41,263, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $86,402, a difference of 5.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanBangladeshi
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Tragic
$35,897
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Tragic
$88,358
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Tragic
$74,112
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Tragic
$41,263
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Tragic
$46,744
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Tragic
$35,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Tragic
$47,589
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Tragic
$81,363
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Tragic
$86,402
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Tragic
$54,719
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Exceptional
22.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 20.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 20.1%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.050%), married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and single female poverty (23.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanBangladeshi
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
16.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
20.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
20.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
20.0%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
24.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
31.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
15.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 88.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 83.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 81.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.7%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanBangladeshi
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanBangladeshi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
42.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
81.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.4%), single father households (3.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.6% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.28%), currently married (44.6% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.37, a difference of 3.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanBangladeshi
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
30.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
8.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
43.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Tragic
34.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 80.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 6.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanBangladeshi
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Exceptional
58.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 141.6%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.6%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (61.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 0.62%), college, 1 year or more (53.4% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and nursery school (98.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanBangladeshi
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
96.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
96.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
95.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
94.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
93.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
90.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
89.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
86.9%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Tragic
61.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Tragic
40.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 68.2%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.8%), female disability (13.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 9.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Bangladeshi Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanBangladeshi
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Tragic
26.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Tragic
49.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%