Alaskan Athabascan vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,464,137 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 4.0 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($76,383 compared to $84,729, a difference of 10.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $98,778, a difference of 8.6%), and median family income ($94,429 compared to $98,869, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,163 compared to $39,403, a difference of 0.61%), median earnings ($43,393 compared to $43,673, a difference of 0.65%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $37,497, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 36.0%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.3%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty (14.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 86.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 81.6%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 72.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.9%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.2%), currently married (44.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.41, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 94.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.4%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and associate's degree (36.5% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.16%), ged/equivalency (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 53.9%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.030%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.6%).