Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Scandinavians

Fair
Good
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Scandinavian Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,910,224 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.771. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.100% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 99.6 Scandinavians.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Scandinavian Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $102,969, a difference of 13.2%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $86,073, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $38,306, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $61,586, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $52,654, a difference of 1.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanScandinavian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Average
$43,848
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Good
$104,410
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Good
$86,073
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Average
$46,433
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Good
$55,527
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Tragic
$38,306
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Good
$52,654
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Good
$95,596
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Good
$102,969
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Good
$61,586
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
29.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 50.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 46.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 11.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanScandinavian
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.6%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
12.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Fair
20.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
15.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 111.7%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 108.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 103.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanScandinavian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanScandinavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Good
83.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.8%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.1%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.14, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (61.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanScandinavian
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Exceptional
29.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 122.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 12.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 8.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanScandinavian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
7.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Exceptional
93.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Exceptional
62.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
23.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 30.2%), associate's degree (36.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 28.6%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 5th grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and 10th grade (95.4% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanScandinavian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Exceptional
67.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Excellent
61.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Good
46.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Average
1.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 47.6%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.9%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scandinavian Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanScandinavian
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Average
23.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%