Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Czechoslovakians

Fair
Good
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czechoslovakian Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,005,058 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 61.8 Czechoslovakians.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $43,806, a difference of 11.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $101,387, a difference of 11.5%), and median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $55,382, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $51,224, a difference of 0.96%), median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $38,738, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $60,581, a difference of 2.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanCzechoslovakian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Average
$43,806
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Average
$103,273
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Average
$84,965
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Average
$46,658
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Good
$55,382
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Poor
$38,738
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Tragic
$51,224
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Average
$95,070
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Good
$101,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Average
$60,581
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
28.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 42.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 39.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and single female poverty (23.6% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 10.7%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanCzechoslovakian
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Good
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 101.4%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 97.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 89.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.7%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanCzechoslovakian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanCzechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
41.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Good
83.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 45.3%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.2%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (61.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanCzechoslovakian
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Fair
32.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 99.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 8.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanCzechoslovakian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 28.4%), associate's degree (36.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.040%), 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and 4th grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.30%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanCzechoslovakian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Fair
1.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 49.9%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Czechoslovakian Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanCzechoslovakian
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Average
2.5%