Alaskan Athabascan vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,569,499 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 27.9 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $71,697, a difference of 23.4%), per capita income ($39,163 compared to $32,345, a difference of 21.1%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $31,489, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $59,383, a difference of 5.0%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $67,965, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 36.2%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 32.6%), and family poverty (10.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 109.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 99.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 82.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 21.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 24.9%), single father households (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.3%), and divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.8%), married-couple households (43.6% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (61.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 112.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 47.0%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.6%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 32.8%), and hearing disability (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.5%).