Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Scottish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Scottish

Fair
Good
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,834
SOCIAL INDEX
65.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
139th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Scottish Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,657,395 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.082. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to a decrease of 8.7 Scottish.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Scottish Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $44,440, a difference of 13.5%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $102,123, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $61,735, a difference of 0.96%), median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $38,397, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $50,554, a difference of 2.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanScottish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Good
$44,440
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Good
$104,288
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Average
$85,101
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Average
$46,463
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Good
$55,793
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Tragic
$38,397
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Tragic
$50,554
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Average
$94,622
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Good
$102,123
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Good
$61,735
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
29.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 48.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 42.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 0.46%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanScottish
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
30.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 105.3%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 104.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 93.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanScottish
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
16.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanScottish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
63.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
42.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
82.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 47.0%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.0%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.9%), divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (61.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanScottish
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
49.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
49.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Average
31.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 130.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 8.6%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanScottish
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
6.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Exceptional
93.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Exceptional
61.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 32.1%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 31.1%), and associate's degree (36.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 6th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanScottish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Exceptional
67.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Excellent
60.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Good
46.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Average
38.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Excellent
2.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 37.2%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Scottish Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanScottish
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
46.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Average
2.5%