Alaskan Athabascan vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Pima
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,619,018 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.124% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 1,123.8 Pima.
Alaskan Athabascan vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $30,644, a difference of 27.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $73,365, a difference of 24.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $50,539, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.41%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $82,821, a difference of 6.8%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $35,326, a difference of 7.3%).
Income Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,163 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $94,429 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $76,383 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,393 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,748 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,905 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,713 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,446 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,951 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,330 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.8% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 88.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 86.7%), and family poverty (10.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 82.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 22.5%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 25.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 25.7%).
Poverty Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Pima |
Poverty | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.1% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 123.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 84.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 75.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Pima |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.7% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.6% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 8.4% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 11.7% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 32.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 10.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.9% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 45.2% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 79.1% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Tragic 72.8% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 36.5%), currently married (44.6% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 24.3%), and single father households (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.7%), divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (61.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Pima |
Family Households | Tragic 61.8% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.6% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.27 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.6% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.7% | Tragic 51.5% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.36%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.0% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.2% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.4%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 30.1%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.58%).
Education Level Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.3% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.0% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.4% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.5% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Tragic 1.3% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 43.4%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 36.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Disability Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Pima |
Disability | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 54.0% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |