Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,886,357 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.714. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 26.0 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $52,044, a difference of 32.9%), median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $63,326, a difference of 27.3%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $96,378, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $64,512, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $55,891, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 57.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 45.6%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.56%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 87.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 87.0%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 85.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 32.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 72.5%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 38.9%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 29.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.62%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 67.7%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 58.8%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.11%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.65%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 83.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 59.6%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.080%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 14.8%).