Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Slavs

Fair
Good
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Slavic Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,593,816 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 12.6 Slavs.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Slavic Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $45,049, a difference of 15.0%), median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $56,390, a difference of 13.4%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $86,398, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $61,709, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $50,563, a difference of 2.3%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $39,613, a difference of 4.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanSlavic
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Excellent
$45,049
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Good
$105,144
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Good
$86,398
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Excellent
$47,470
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Excellent
$56,390
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Average
$39,613
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Tragic
$50,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Good
$96,377
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Good
$102,629
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Good
$61,709
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
27.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 44.6%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 38.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.7%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanSlavic
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Fair
29.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 96.3%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 93.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 87.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanSlavic
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanSlavic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Good
82.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.1%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (61.8% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanSlavic
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Excellent
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Average
31.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 74.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanSlavic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Exceptional
91.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Excellent
6.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 34.9%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 33.9%), and associate's degree (36.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.16%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and 10th grade (95.4% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanSlavic
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Excellent
66.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Good
38.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Good
1.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 55.6%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.6%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Slavic Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanSlavic
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Fair
2.5%