Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Czechs

Fair
Excellent
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,737,606 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 10.6 Czechs.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Czech Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $44,595, a difference of 13.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $103,507, a difference of 13.8%), and median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $56,546, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $51,421, a difference of 0.57%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $61,244, a difference of 1.8%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $38,992, a difference of 2.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanCzech
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
29.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 59.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 50.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.7%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 10.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanCzech
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (9.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 116.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 113.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 108.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanCzech
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 45.8%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.4%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.040%), family households (61.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.11, a difference of 5.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanCzech
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Excellent
30.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 126.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanCzech
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 31.8%), associate's degree (36.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 29.4%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 4th grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanCzech
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Good
1.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 51.2%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.9%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanCzech
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%