Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,473,846 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 9.4 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($76,383 compared to $111,519, a difference of 46.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $128,140, a difference of 44.9%), and per capita income ($39,163 compared to $56,709, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 0.94%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $71,567, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $62,083, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 84.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 75.6%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 61.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 96.4%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 86.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 86.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 48.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 84.3%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 60.0%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.20%), and family households (61.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 38.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 84.4%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 76.8%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 100.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 91.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.9%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 16.1%).