Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Portugal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,288,810 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.563. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Immigrants from Portugal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 33.4 Immigrants from Portugal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $55,924, a difference of 11.5%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $84,740, a difference of 10.9%), and median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $55,182, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $54,105, a difference of 4.6%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $39,788, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 35.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 32.7%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.83%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 86.8%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 67.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.0%), divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and family households (61.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.52%), currently married (44.6% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 32.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 82.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 65.7%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and female disability (13.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.5%).