Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hungarian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Hungarians

Fair
Good
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,572
SOCIAL INDEX
63.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
149th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hungarian Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,724,408 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Hungarians.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Hungarian Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $45,426, a difference of 16.0%), median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $57,309, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $103,913, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $61,673, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $50,247, a difference of 2.9%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $39,510, a difference of 4.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanHungarian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Excellent
$45,426
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Excellent
$105,609
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Good
$86,920
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Excellent
$47,795
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Exceptional
$57,309
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Average
$39,510
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Tragic
$50,247
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Excellent
$97,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Excellent
$103,913
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Good
$61,673
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
29.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.5%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanHungarian
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Good
12.2%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Good
13.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Average
16.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Fair
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
11.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 90.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 89.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 85.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanHungarian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanHungarian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
39.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Fair
82.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 55.4%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.8%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (61.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanHungarian
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
49.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Good
31.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 57.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 10.7%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanHungarian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Excellent
56.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Good
19.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Good
6.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 34.4%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 32.8%), and associate's degree (36.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.070%), 10th grade (95.4% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and 9th grade (96.4% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanHungarian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Average
59.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Average
46.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Good
38.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Good
15.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Excellent
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Good
1.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 57.3%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Hungarian Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanHungarian
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Average
2.5%