Alaskan Athabascan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Chickasaw
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,188,731 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 73.0 Chickasaw.
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $53,732, a difference of 16.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $44,763, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $77,929, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $47,832, a difference of 4.0%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and median earnings ($43,393 compared to $40,672, a difference of 6.7%).
Income Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,163 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $94,429 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $76,383 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,393 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,748 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,905 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,713 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,446 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,951 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,330 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.8% | Tragic 27.2% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.8%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 13.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.010%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 99.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 93.9%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 89.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 9.8% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 10.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 7.1% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.4% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Labor Participation Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.9% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 45.2% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 79.1% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.7%), divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and married-couple households (43.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 61.8% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.27 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.6% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.7% | Tragic 36.3% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 98.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.2% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 15.6%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.6%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.4% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
Education Level Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.3% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.0% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 20.0%), hearing disability (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.93%), male disability (14.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Disability Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 54.0% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |