Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Fair
Excellent
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,568,238 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.965. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 49.7 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $51,770, a difference of 32.2%), median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $62,217, a difference of 25.1%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $95,319, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $54,352, a difference of 5.1%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $66,376, a difference of 6.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Exceptional
$51,770
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Exceptional
$116,165
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Exceptional
$95,319
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Exceptional
$52,361
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Exceptional
$62,217
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Exceptional
$43,571
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Exceptional
$54,352
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Exceptional
$106,888
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Exceptional
$111,914
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Exceptional
$66,376
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
27.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 57.8%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 52.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.0%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 11.6%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 91.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 91.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 91.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.7%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Fair
17.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Average
36.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 66.0%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 37.3%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.9%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Exceptional
28.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 39.7%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
5.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 60.3%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 53.0%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.040%), 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.41%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Exceptional
69.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
51.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 71.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 57.7%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.4%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%