Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Macedonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Macedonians

Fair
Excellent
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,797
SOCIAL INDEX
85.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
47th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Macedonian Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,226,129 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Macedonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 90.0 Macedonians.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Macedonian Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $47,573, a difference of 21.5%), median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $59,522, a difference of 19.7%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $90,761, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $61,564, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $54,563, a difference of 5.5%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $41,286, a difference of 8.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanMacedonian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Exceptional
$47,573
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Exceptional
$109,668
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Exceptional
$90,761
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Exceptional
$49,893
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Exceptional
$59,522
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Exceptional
$41,286
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Exceptional
$54,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Exceptional
$101,882
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Exceptional
$107,074
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Good
$61,564
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
28.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 60.0%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 48.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanMacedonian
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
18.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
18.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 90.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 90.1%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 88.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 9.7%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanMacedonian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 4.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanMacedonian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
37.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 68.9%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 35.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.1%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanMacedonian
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
47.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Exceptional
27.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 46.8%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 23.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanMacedonian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Tragic
87.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Tragic
17.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
5.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 44.4%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 43.8%), and associate's degree (36.5% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.16%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and 10th grade (95.4% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.29%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanMacedonian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
61.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
49.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
41.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Good
1.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 73.7%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.6%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Macedonian Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanMacedonian
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Exceptional
21.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%