Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,131,689 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.526. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.189% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 189.3 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $51,361, a difference of 31.1%), median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $63,346, a difference of 27.3%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $96,836, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $66,087, a difference of 6.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $55,028, a difference of 6.4%), and wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 72.2%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 58.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 9.7%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 18.2%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 95.8%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 90.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 85.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 21.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 79.0%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 39.2%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.9%), family households (61.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 58.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 43.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 59.8%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 54.8%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.23%), 10th grade (95.4% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 82.0%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 64.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.3%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.4%).