Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Denmark Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,434,126 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.992. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Immigrants from Denmark. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 18.8 Immigrants from Denmark.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $53,799, a difference of 37.4%), median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $64,625, a difference of 29.9%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $98,510, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $52,612, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $68,801, a difference of 10.4%), and wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 52.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 50.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.9%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 91.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 87.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 84.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 25.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 63.6%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 32.7%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.8% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 40.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 0.26%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 68.9%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 68.8%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.090%), 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 71.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 52.0%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.3%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.7%).