Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Nicaraguan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Nicaraguans

Fair
Fair
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,542
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
217th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Nicaraguan Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,228,027 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.877. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.131% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 130.7 Nicaraguans.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Nicaraguan Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $54,474, a difference of 14.4%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $79,737, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,163 compared to $39,372, a difference of 0.53%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $87,751, a difference of 0.79%), and median earnings ($43,393 compared to $43,026, a difference of 0.85%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanNicaraguan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Tragic
$39,372
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Tragic
$92,231
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Tragic
$79,737
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Tragic
$43,026
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Tragic
$49,215
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Tragic
$36,904
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Exceptional
$53,275
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Tragic
$87,751
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Tragic
$92,554
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Tragic
$54,474
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Exceptional
23.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 41.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 31.9%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.54%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanNicaraguan
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
13.9%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
18.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
18.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
18.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Poor
29.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Tragic
15.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
16.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 91.6%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 90.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 90.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanNicaraguan
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Poor
5.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 39.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanNicaraguan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Tragic
32.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Average
82.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.9%), family households (61.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and married-couple households (43.6% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.92%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanNicaraguan
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
67.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
44.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Tragic
36.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 61.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 6.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanNicaraguan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Good
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
20.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 100.7%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.4% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 0.90%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanNicaraguan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
95.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
93.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
93.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
88.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
87.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
84.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Tragic
80.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Tragic
59.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
53.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
33.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 95.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 61.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.5%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 11.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Nicaraguan Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanNicaraguan
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Poor
23.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%