Alaskan Athabascan vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,598,275 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.504. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 13.1 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $53,737, a difference of 16.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $47,380, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $83,682, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,163 compared to $39,104, a difference of 0.15%), median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $49,374, a difference of 0.76%), and median earnings ($43,393 compared to $42,430, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 15.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.83%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 80.2%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 72.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 70.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.7%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.6% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.16%), married-couple households (43.6% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and family households (61.8% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 42.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.96%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.4%), associate's degree (36.5% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 17.4%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and 4th grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 44.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 27.1%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.27%), female disability (13.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.8%).