Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa

20.6%
60.1%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. 74108 60.1% 33.5% (+26.6)#25 33.4% (+26.7)#1,433
2. 74110 57.2% 33.5% (+23.7)#36 33.4% (+23.8)#2,215
3. 74126 52.8% 33.5% (+19.3)#55 33.4% (+19.4)#3,575
4. 74112 47.2% 33.5% (+13.7)#83 33.4% (+13.8)#5,610
5. 74114 45.6% 33.5% (+12.1)#91 33.4% (+12.2)#6,181
6. 74127 41.4% 33.5% (+7.90)#116 33.4% (+8.00)#7,816
7. 74119 37.9% 33.5% (+4.40)#140 33.4% (+4.50)#9,276
8. 74134 36.2% 33.5% (+2.70)#156 33.4% (+2.80)#10,006
9. 74120 36.1% 33.5% (+2.60)#157 33.4% (+2.70)#10,049
10. 74105 34.9% 33.5% (+1.40)#168 33.4% (+1.50)#10,563
11. 74145 34.5% 33.5% (+1.000)#173 33.4% (+1.10)#10,762
12. 74129 34.4% 33.5% (+0.900)#178 33.4% (+1.00)#10,825
13. 74107 34.1% 33.5% (+0.600)#180 33.4% (+0.700)#10,926
14. 74137 33.8% 33.5% (+0.300)#182 33.4% (+0.400)#11,044
15. 74103 32.7% 33.5% (-0.800)#195 33.4% (-0.700)#11,513
16. 74136 31.6% 33.5% (-1.90)#204 33.4% (-1.80)#11,950
17. 74106 30.8% 33.5% (-2.70)#207 33.4% (-2.60)#12,285
18. 74135 30.4% 33.5% (-3.10)#215 33.4% (-3.00)#12,465
19. 74146 29.4% 33.5% (-4.10)#224 33.4% (-4.00)#12,855
20. 74115 27.3% 33.5% (-6.20)#238 33.4% (-6.10)#13,616
21. 74133 27.2% 33.5% (-6.30)#240 33.4% (-6.20)#13,634
22. 74104 21.6% 33.5% (-11.9)#284 33.4% (-11.8)#15,513
23. 74171 20.6% 33.5% (-12.9)#291 33.4% (-12.8)#16,054

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
60.1%
#2
57.2%
#3
52.8%
#4
47.2%
#5
45.6%
#6
41.4%
#7
37.9%
#8
36.2%
#9
36.1%
#10
34.9%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa, OK?
74108 has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa, OK with 60.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa is 31.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Oklahoma is 33.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.