Yuman Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yuman
Select to Compare
Female Poverty
Yuman Female Poverty
20.8%
POVERTY | FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,663,290 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631 and weighted average of 20.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yuman within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.21% in poverty level among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Yuman and poverty level among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Yuman influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females within an area, or if Yuman simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Yuman by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Sioux (20.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Hopi (21.0%, a difference of 0.56%), Pueblo (20.7%, a difference of 0.81%), Yup'ik (21.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and Cheyenne (20.2%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
Yuman Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yuman Data | Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.022% | 12.1% |
| Maximum | 87.0% | 42.1% |
| Range | 86.9% | 30.1% |
| Mean | 23.7% | 24.5% |
| Median | 9.7% | 22.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.7% | 32.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 42.6% | 16.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.8% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.1% | 9.5% |
Correlation Details
| Yuman Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 40,016,771 | 15.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 507,493 | 13.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 48,669 | 13.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 29,609 | 12.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 3,529 | 18.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 689 | 42.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.97% | 19,488 | 22.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.14% | 9,106 | 21.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 9,119 | 14.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.92% | 527 | 14.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 5,447 | 29.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.36% | 4,895 | 30.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.98% | 362 | 17.9% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.71% | 1,370 | 15.8% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 120 | 26.7% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.46% | 104 | 30.3% |
[ 50.5% - 51.0% ] 50.95% | 630 | 33.9% |
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.23% | 1,967 | 41.4% |
[ 72.0% - 72.5% ] 72.47% | 1,867 | 34.2% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.49% | 1,482 | 36.6% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.96% | 46 | 29.4% |