Yuman vs British Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Yuman
British
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Yuman
British
9.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs British Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,644,577 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.665 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,525,466 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 126.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yuman | British |
Minimum | 2.7% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 26.2% | 50.0% |
Range | 23.5% | 47.6% |
Mean | 12.3% | 11.5% |
Median | 12.3% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 12.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.6% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 11.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Yuman by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Crow (9.6%, a difference of 1.8%), Cheyenne (9.4%, a difference of 3.2%), Yakama (9.0%, a difference of 8.7%), Apache (9.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and Sioux (8.7%, a difference of 11.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to British by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Serbian (4.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |