Yakama vs Chippewa Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Yakama
Chippewa
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Yakama
Chippewa
9.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Chippewa Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,842,420 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.847 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,662,644 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 64.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yakama | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 40.1% | 34.1% |
| Range | 37.1% | 32.9% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 8.4% |
| Median | 6.6% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 7.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Yakama by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Apache (9.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Sioux (8.7%, a difference of 3.0%), Cheyenne (9.4%, a difference of 5.3%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (8.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and Crow (9.6%, a difference of 6.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
| French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
| Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |