Lithuanian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,518,984 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.841. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.214% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 213.6 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $82,193, a difference of 36.8%), per capita income ($49,448 compared to $36,475, a difference of 35.6%), and median family income ($115,395 compared to $85,356, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $44,763, a difference of 19.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $53,732, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 51.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 46.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 9.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 34.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.4%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.6%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.55%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (49.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.62%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 60.1%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 55.3%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 56.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 49.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.8%).