Immigrants from Colombia vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,649,665 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Colombia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.366. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Colombia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Colombia corresponds to an increase of 22.5 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,714 compared to $44,763, a difference of 20.0%), median household income ($83,902 compared to $70,005, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,290 compared to $82,193, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,658 compared to $53,732, a difference of 7.3%), median male earnings ($52,725 compared to $47,832, a difference of 10.2%), and wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 41.1%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 35.1%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and family poverty (9.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.3%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.15%), married-couple households (46.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (46.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.9%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.6%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 32.9%), and master's degree (14.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.27%), ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 65.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 65.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.7%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.8%).