White/Caucasian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Chickasaw
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in White/Caucasian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,725,310 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Chickasaw.
White/Caucasian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $82,193, a difference of 19.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $77,929, a difference of 17.6%), and median household income ($82,029 compared to $70,005, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.0%), median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $34,414, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $53,732, a difference of 9.5%).
Income Metric | White/Caucasian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,180 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Poor $99,800 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,029 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,197 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,925 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,531 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,336 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,668 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,091 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,847 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.5% | Tragic 27.2% |
White/Caucasian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 23.7%), male poverty (11.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 21.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (18.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.4%).
Poverty Metric | White/Caucasian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.1% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.2% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
White/Caucasian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 37.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | White/Caucasian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.9% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
White/Caucasian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | White/Caucasian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.5% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.3% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 79.0% |
White/Caucasian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | White/Caucasian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.6% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 36.3% |
White/Caucasian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.90%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | White/Caucasian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.1% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
White/Caucasian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 21.2%), master's degree (13.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | White/Caucasian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 91.8% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.1% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.0% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.6% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 44.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.3% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
White/Caucasian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 33.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.9%).
Disability Metric | White/Caucasian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |