Tohono O'odham vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Chickasaw
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,326,889 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.034% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 34.4 Chickasaw.
Tohono O'odham vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 22.7%), median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $47,832, a difference of 21.0%), and per capita income ($30,256 compared to $36,475, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $44,763, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $34,414, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $53,732, a difference of 9.4%).
Income Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,256 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $72,193 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $61,663 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,349 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $39,543 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,205 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,248 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $69,068 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,774 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,121 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 27.2% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 95.0%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 93.8%), and family poverty (20.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 88.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.1%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 25.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 26.7%).
Poverty Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 24.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 24.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 29.5% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.7% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 34.2% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.0% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 20.8% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 96.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 94.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 79.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 23.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 10.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 7.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.1% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 9.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.9% | Good 5.4% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.4% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 38.9%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 37.3%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.76%), family households (67.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.53 compared to 3.19, a difference of 10.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.53 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 36.8% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 36.3% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 98.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 18.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 8.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.0% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.4%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and associate's degree (31.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.52%).
Education Level Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.6% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.7% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.1% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.8% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 47.1% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Tohono O'odham vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 25.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (15.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.5%), disability (14.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and male disability (14.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Disability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 36.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.7% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.9% |