Slovak vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,457,611 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Slovak communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.841. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slovaks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slovaks corresponds to an increase of 97.1 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,029 compared to $82,193, a difference of 22.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,032 compared to $77,929, a difference of 22.0%), and median family income ($103,729 compared to $85,356, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income over 65 years ($59,039 compared to $53,732, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,753 compared to $44,763, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.9%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 37.2%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and single mother poverty (30.4% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 41.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.9%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.9%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (47.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.6%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 27.2%), and no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 34.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.7%).