Aleut vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,985,519 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Aleut communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Aleuts within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Aleuts corresponds to an increase of 29.3 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,052 compared to $82,193, a difference of 21.7%), median household income ($83,446 compared to $70,005, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,370 compared to $77,929, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,168 compared to $47,832, a difference of 7.0%), median earnings ($44,241 compared to $40,672, a difference of 8.8%), and median female earnings ($38,719 compared to $34,414, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.4%), female poverty (13.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.8%), and poverty (12.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%), single female poverty (25.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 56.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 43.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.71%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 13.5%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and births to unmarried women (39.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.15%), married-couple households (45.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 65.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 5.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 7.8%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and college, 1 year or more (55.4% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.13%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and hearing disability (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.6%).