Immigrants from Turkey vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,492,912 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Turkey communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.860. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Turkey within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.252% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Turkey corresponds to an increase of 251.8 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,368 compared to $36,475, a difference of 40.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,407 compared to $82,193, a difference of 39.2%), and median family income ($118,325 compared to $85,356, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.78%), householder income under 25 years ($52,503 compared to $44,763, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,672 compared to $53,732, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 43.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 41.6%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 30.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 37.9%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.17%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and married-couple households (46.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 45.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 83.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 75.1%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 72.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 66.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 63.4%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.2%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.2%).