Basque vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Basque
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Basques

Chickasaw

Good
Fair
6,979
SOCIAL INDEX
67.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
133rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Basque Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,707,940 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Basque communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Basques within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.364% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Basques corresponds to an increase of 364.3 Chickasaw.
Basque Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Basque vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Basque and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,387 compared to $82,193, a difference of 25.8%), median household income ($87,001 compared to $70,005, a difference of 24.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,709 compared to $77,929, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.0%), median female earnings ($38,352 compared to $34,414, a difference of 11.4%), and median earnings ($46,399 compared to $40,672, a difference of 14.1%).
Basque vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricBasqueChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,086
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Good
$104,760
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Good
$87,001
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Average
$46,399
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,370
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,352
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,818
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,709
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,387
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,653
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
27.2%

Basque vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Basque and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 36.0%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 33.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 13.0%).
Basque vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricBasqueChickasaw
Poverty
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Good
10.9%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.4%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.5%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.1%

Basque vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Basque and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.32%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.50%).
Basque vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBasqueChickasaw
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.4%

Basque vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Basque and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Basque vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBasqueChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.3%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.4%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
79.0%

Basque vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Basque and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.9%), births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.080%), family households (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Basque vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBasqueChickasaw
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.1%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.7%
Tragic
36.3%

Basque vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Basque and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
Basque vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBasqueChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.4%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.3%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.4%

Basque vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Basque and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 38.3%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.3%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%).
Basque vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricBasqueChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.4%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.2%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
91.8%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.8%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.4%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.9%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.5%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.7%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Basque vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Basque and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 39.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 39.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.7%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.4%).
Basque vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricBasqueChickasaw
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.5%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.6%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%