Basque vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Basque
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Basques
Chickasaw
6,979
SOCIAL INDEX
67.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
133rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Basque Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,707,940 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Basque communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Basques within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.364% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Basques corresponds to an increase of 364.3 Chickasaw.
Basque vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Basque and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,387 compared to $82,193, a difference of 25.8%), median household income ($87,001 compared to $70,005, a difference of 24.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,709 compared to $77,929, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.0%), median female earnings ($38,352 compared to $34,414, a difference of 11.4%), and median earnings ($46,399 compared to $40,672, a difference of 14.1%).
Income Metric | Basque | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,086 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,760 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Good $87,001 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,399 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,370 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,352 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,818 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,709 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,387 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,653 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 27.2% |
Basque vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Basque and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 36.0%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 33.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 13.0%).
Poverty Metric | Basque | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Good 10.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.5% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
Basque vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Basque and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.32%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.50%).
Unemployment Metric | Basque | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
Basque vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Basque and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Basque | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.3% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Basque vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Basque and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.9%), births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.080%), family households (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Basque | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.7% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.1% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.7% | Tragic 36.3% |
Basque vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Basque and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Basque | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.4% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 24.3% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Basque vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Basque and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 38.3%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.3%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%).
Education Level Metric | Basque | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.2% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 91.8% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.8% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.9% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 37.7% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Basque vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Basque and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 39.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 39.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.7%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.4%).
Disability Metric | Basque | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.5% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.6% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.1% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |