Czech vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,456,317 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 19.5 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $82,193, a difference of 25.9%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $85,356, a difference of 24.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $77,929, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 7.4%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $34,414, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $53,732, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 46.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 44.0%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.3%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 32.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.8%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.080%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 30.1%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 29.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 51.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 42.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 12.1%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.8%).