Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Mexican American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Mexican American Indians

Chickasaw

Poor
Fair
1,555
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
301st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Mexican American Indian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,463,080 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.849. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.096% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 96.2 Chickasaw.
Mexican American Indian Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $44,763, a difference of 15.7%), median household income ($78,166 compared to $70,005, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,811 compared to $82,193, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $47,832, a difference of 0.33%), per capita income ($37,407 compared to $36,475, a difference of 2.6%), and median earnings ($41,719 compared to $40,672, a difference of 2.6%).
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricMexican American IndianChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,407
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,918
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,166
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,719
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,990
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,629
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,783
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,066
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,811
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,089
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
27.2%

Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 24.9%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.11%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.72%).
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricMexican American IndianChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.9%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.4%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.1%

Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.3%).
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMexican American IndianChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.3%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.4%

Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMexican American IndianChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
64.9%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.0%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.4%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.2%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.7%
Tragic
79.0%

Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 18.1%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.19, a difference of 7.5%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMexican American IndianChickasaw
Family Households
Exceptional
67.0%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.7%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.43
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.5%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
36.3%

Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.48%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 4.8%).
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMexican American IndianChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.7%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.3%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.4%

Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 88.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and high school diploma (83.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.51%), associate's degree (38.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricMexican American IndianChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.0%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.7%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.0%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.4%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.1%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.9%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.2%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.3%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.9%).
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricMexican American IndianChickasaw
Disability
Poor
12.0%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Fair
3.0%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%