Arapaho vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,921,195 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 6.3 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 15.8%), median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $47,832, a difference of 14.5%), and per capita income ($32,345 compared to $36,475, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $44,763, a difference of 1.7%), median household income ($67,965 compared to $70,005, a difference of 3.0%), and median family income ($82,064 compared to $85,356, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 34.4%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (26.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.63%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 127.9%), male unemployment (11.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 112.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 112.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 29.8%), currently married (40.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.19, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.95%), family households (66.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.49%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.4%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.2%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 44.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 7.5%).