Guyanese vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Guyanese
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Guyanese
Chickasaw
2,059
SOCIAL INDEX
18.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
273rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Guyanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,451,119 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Guyanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.223. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guyanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guyanese corresponds to a decrease of 17.8 Chickasaw.
Guyanese vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 48.4%), householder income under 25 years ($55,210 compared to $44,763, a difference of 23.3%), and median female earnings ($40,973 compared to $34,414, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,351 compared to $53,732, a difference of 4.9%), median male earnings ($50,613 compared to $47,832, a difference of 5.8%), and median family income ($93,373 compared to $85,356, a difference of 9.4%).
Income Metric | Guyanese | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,949 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,373 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,734 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,470 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,613 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,973 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,210 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,940 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,966 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,351 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 27.2% |
Guyanese vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 38.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and receiving food stamps (16.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and poverty (14.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Guyanese | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Average 12.8% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.8% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.4% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Guyanese vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 48.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Guyanese | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 24.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.6% | Good 5.4% |
Guyanese vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 39.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Guyanese | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.2% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
Guyanese vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.8%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 23.3%), and currently married (41.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.3%), births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.19, a difference of 6.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Guyanese | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.4% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.40 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.6% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 35.2% | Tragic 36.3% |
Guyanese vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 272.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 113.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 93.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 30.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 66.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 93.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Guyanese | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 29.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 70.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 35.4% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Guyanese vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 79.2%), master's degree (13.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and bachelor's degree (34.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Guyanese | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.5% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.0% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.5% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Guyanese vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 95.9%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 71.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.2%).
Disability Metric | Guyanese | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.9% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.9% |